Translate

Thursday, 19 February 2015

The Celebration of Purim

  Purim the Jewish festival in Israel celebrates God's invisible faithfulness.
The Jewish nations, existential threat from an evil man named Haman
 (See Book of Esther). Today, the existential threat comes from the
OIC ( Organization of Islamic Communities). The demand and
implementation of Sharia in Western and Eastern Nations where Islamic
communities gain a foothold, begin to insist that Islamic Law and
Religion supersedes all other cultures  


Esther accuses Haman


 What the OIC represents is Sharia in its completeness. What is Sharia ?
Essentially, Islamic Law that soo completely envelopes Judeo Christian or
even Socialist values. Muslim fifth columnists that lay the foundation that
the West is responsible for pain and suffering in the middle-east. While
turning a blind-eye to the butchering done by Sunni and Shiah counterparts
in the millions. Raja Petra Kammaruddin states that

 Actually, the so-called ‘war on terror’ is a war on Islam and many Muslims
are being ‘legitimately’ killed in the name of world peace. What hypocrisy! 
Christians kill Muslims so that the world can be a better and more peaceful 
place?

Let me posit an observation which seems to evade his psyche. If one chose
to follow a religion, or live under a sharia government, or a despot that 
uses the hadith as a moral benchmark. Should one be exempt from the 
consequences of one's decision ? Dr. Mahathir Mohamed former prime 
minister of Malaysia decries the deaths of hundreds of thousands being 
murdered by US Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan. Are US Forces currently 
murdering hundreds of thousands of Christians, Yaziris, Sunnis, and 
Shiahs in Iraq? How many thousands did the Taliban murder of its own 
peoples in the day to day implementation of the Sharia in Afghanistan. 
I'll call a spade a spade. The West in its bid to implement its Colonial 
Free Market Hand on Islamo Fascists nations should have never stuck 
their hands in the Hornets Nest. They are responsible for their portion
of the Blood Bath that's occurring, over in these middle-east cesspools. 
Christians however should stick with Israel as it is the only Democracy 
that looks after its own Christians, Muslims, Gays, Lesbians, Zoroastrians 
etc, etc, etc. Lebanon is one example of how the failure of its Christian 
Majority made way for fractiousness Islamo fascist groups. I will never 
forget that Islamist Government Officer that came into my Church 
Camp to threaten us in Malaysia.

Haman's of the world the likes of Raja Petra Kammarudin, Reza Azlan, 
Karen Armstrong, Mona Elthahawy,....  can continue to pave the way 
for the Islamic Sharia's Fifth Column.

'Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin' Numbered Numbered Weight Divided. 
The Lord has Weighted the Nations and its days are numbered ~ Daniel 5:25

addendum:


An Inquiry Into Islam ~Daniel Byantoro

For thousands of years my country (Indonesia) was a Hindu Buddhist kingdom. 
The last Hindu king was kind enough to give a tax exempt property for the first 
Muslim missionary to live and to preach his religion. Slowly the followers of 
the new religion were growing, and after they became so strong the kingdom 
was attacked, those who refused to become Muslims had to flee for their life to 
the neighboring island of Bali or to a high mountain of Tengger, where they 
have been able to keep their religion until now. Slowly from the Hindu Buddhist 
Kingdom, Indonesia became the largest Islamic country in the world. If there is 
any lesson to be learnt by Americans at all, the history of my country is worth 
pondering upon. We are not hate mongering, bigoted people; rather, we are 
freedom loving, democracy loving and human loving people. We just don’t 
want this freedom and democracy to be taken away from us by our ignorance 
and misguided “political correctness”, and the pretension of tolerance. 

My question, as a former Malaysian. What happened to the Hindu Buddhist
Kingdom of the Malaysian Archipelago. Parameswara the Hindu Prince and 
his Malay Hindu Buddhist subjects after the Advent of Islam in Malaysia. 
A self-genocide, i guess, because there are no Malay Hindus or Buddhists in 
Malaysia. None whatsoever....



Wednesday, 18 February 2015

On matters of the Heart Part IV

continuation.....



  • Don Tan To throw the first stone you need to be a witness. Yeshua was not present when the adulterous crime was committed.

    Per divorce HaShem made it quite clear how he views it...


    16If you hate [her], send [her] away, says the Lord God of Israel. For injustice shall cover his garment, said the Lord of Hosts, but you shall beware of your spirit, and do not deal treacherously. טזכִּי שָׂנֵא שַׁלַּח אָמַר יְהֹוָה אֱלֹהֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל וְכִסָּה חָמָס עַל לְבוּשׁוֹ אָמַר יְהֹוָה צְבָאוֹת וְנִשְׁמַרְתֶּם בְּרוּחֲכֶם וְלֹא תִבְגֹּדוּ: Malachi 2


  • MB Are you sure the person (himself) needed to be the witness in order to throw stone?

    Before stoning, they must went throught Shanderin court that time. Even jesus was a witness, he had no right to throw stone because they need the legal court process.


    Shandarin court was not in power at that time (during the time of jesus) due to Rome.

    So, not to throw stone or to throw stone has nothing to do with witnessess because that was suppose to be done by the court. He has no right to decide. Plus, if not mistaken --the new testament never mentioned jesus himself intended to throw stone, he in fact questioned the olders who stand there.


  • Don Tan Are you making an inference or an empirical statement ?

    It may seem logical to infer something. However, if you read the text without adding, removing, or drawing, additional conclusions. It doesn't say they went through a Shanderin court. If you read the text directly, it explicitly states they caught her in the act, and dragged her to the Rabbi Yeshua to see what he would do...... court or no court....


  • MB This is the New Testament, a book that cannot be trusted and imcomplete with full error. Do you know there was Jewish court (Shanderin by that time) that time? Before the Rome was so powerful the Jewish court was in effective for Jewish law. After the Rome in power, the Shanderin gone.

    (*Logical sense, without Jewish court and law -- how do they intepreted laws out without them? Impossible. Even without historical knowledge to know shanderin existed, the common sense would tells us.)

    The one that REMOVING this fact is the new testament. Read the history and is in there. The NT never mentioned Jewish court -- that is the loop hole for NT and CHristianity.


  • MB In addition, when they dragged to jesus they (the olders) were ("purposefully") tested him (jesus) and jesus response to them that who was righteous will be the one who can throw stone.

    jesus himself was a "righteous" and he never throw a stone and Christianity took this opportunity to point out that the law were done away. In truth, jesus knew that this has to pass throguht the shanderin court.

    They were proper rules and regulations in Shanderin court to decide and will eventually void the case because no one can murder another, only G-d can take away a life of a person. They will take the laws to void it.

    (Note: That is why Israel has no death penalty today because when you intepreted the laws up to the highest level, death penalty is illegal -- in conventional speaking. However, killing is not illegal, murdering is. When a person repent during the trial, he turn back to G-d, and if that court sentence him to death after he repented, that court is in trouble and that is consider murder.)

    Unfortunately, today Christians knowledge mistook this. And unfortunately, today Muslim knowledge blindly copy the old testament and run it.


  • Don Tan In this instance, could one prove empirically, that the Shanderin court was used ? YES or NO ? It's not a trick question.

    I accept the New Testament by faith. Just as i accept the Old Testament by faith, and as i said, before receiving confirmation my
    self..

    By the way, Muslims say both the Old and New Testament's are distorted. They themselves, cannot provide an empirical undistorted
    text, accept for ramblings from a desert dweller that poached writings from all over, and wrote it in a poetic form. Hence, claimed that there isn't a book like the one he dictated....

Monday, 9 February 2015

On matters of the Heart Part III

  • Continuation.....

     

  • MB
    Line 18. “And the high holy ones will receive the kingdom, and they will inherit the kingdom forever and to all eternity.”

    The high holy ones are not identified — but as you read through the chapter which outlines pretty much all of history it will b
    ecome obvious that this is Israel. The Jews.

    Read through to line 23 — after war after war and earthly kingdom after earthly kingdom “So he (the angel) said (to Daniel), “The fourth beast [represents] a fourth kingdom [that] will be on the earth, which will be different from all the kingdoms, and it will devour the whole land and trample it and crush it.”

    Again — EARTHLY Kingdom. . . not Jesus who was never a ruler of an earthly kingdom. . .

    10 kingdoms sprout from this last kingdom (which was Rome — and we are still under Western domination aka Rome — the Christians).

    Next is perhaps one of the only true prophecies about Christianity in the Jewish bible: “25. And he will speak words against the Most High, and he will oppress the high holy ones, and he will think to change the times and the law, and they will be delivered into his hand until a time, two times, and half a time.”

    The Christians oppressed the Jews (Holocaust, Pogroms, Spanish Inquisition — it continues to this very day when the United States excluded Israel from a counter terrorist summit). . .

    The Christians changed the times (moving the Sabbath to Sunday and changing the calendars) changing the law (Paul and saying no one needs to keep the mitzvot) — but the end of the Christians will come at the hand of G-d, too. . .

    Line 26 “And the judgment shall be established, and they will remove his dominion to be destroyed and annihilated until the end.”

    And when this last of the kingdoms of Rome (the Christian kingdom) is vanquished by G-d Himself the true messiah will come and as Daniel states 27 - “And the kingdom and the dominion and the greatness of the kingdoms under all the heavens will be given to the people of the high holy ones; its kingdom is a perpetual kingdom, and all dominions will serve and obey [it].” — the messianic era will finally arrive, Baruch HaShem may it come speedily and in our days!




  • MB



  • Don Tan They, the Pharisees, had more than one opportunity to get rid of him . Read for yourself....

    8 Jesus returned to the Mount of Olives, 2 but early the next morning he was back again at the Temple. A crowd soon gathered, and he sat down and taught them.
    3 As he was speaking, the teachers of religious law and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in the act of adultery. They put her in front of the crowd.
    4 “Teacher,” they said to Jesus, “this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5 The law of Moses says to stone her. What do you say?”
    6 They were trying to trap him into saying something they could use against him, but Jesus stooped down and wrote in the dust with his finger. 7 They kept demanding an answer, so he stood up again and said, “All right, but let the one who has never sinned throw the first stone!” 8 Then he stooped down again and wrote in the dust.
    9 When the accusers heard this, they slipped away one by one, beginning with the oldest, until only Jesus was left in the middle of the crowd with the woman. 10 Then Jesus stood up again and said to the woman, “Where are your accusers? Didn’t even one of them condemn you?”
    11 “No, Lord,” she said.
    And Jesus said, “Neither do I. Go and sin no more.” ~ John

    What was he writing on the sand that convicted them of their 'Chet'... ?


  • MB They have more than 1 opportunity to stone him to death and they choose (or “choose”) not to, so?

    They (the Pharisees) still can choose not to stone him to death on the spot and let the Rome do it, what is the problem? I don’t see any problem at all. The purpose still achieve anyway – which is death.

    As I stated again (and yourself stated also), they (the Pharisees) were able to stones those adulterers and others offenders publicly, why are they afraid to stone Jesus publicly (when they can stones others with no problem)?

    This is not about hypocrisy when others are being stoned publicly bt their hand and yet they choosen not to stoned jesus.

    If I translate – why the Pharisees afraid of the so called “dirty hand” when they indeed have no problem on stoning others offenders publicly.

    Here is not about to stain with dirty hand or not to stain with dirty hand. If they (the Pharisees) really afraid of stain with dirty hand, they will not stones the others offenders as well because that is consider dirty.

    So, when you said “if they were stoning adulterers ,...., left, right and centre... What do you think there were going to do to Heretics, Sorcerers and Others.”…..definitely my answer is they stones them to death with no problem at all.

    And you stated “How did Yeshua slip away in the midst of them...... hmmmm” – the answer is very simple which I stated in my previous post, here

    “The Jews might not be able to track him at that time for whatever reason, or have no real intention of direct stoning him to death on the spot or to kill him by their own hand (like you said – “avoid” hand dirty), but still he get killed.

    “Avoid” dirty hand is not the case here for jesus death since they can stones those adulterers to death etc…..why are they afraid to stone jesus when they can stone the others with no problem?

    (stoning thing is not apply in today world anymore since the temple is not stood.)

    The case here is that the Rome is in controlled of almost everything at that time especially criminal punishment.

    Or (just maybe) the Jews are afraid to stone jesus (due to his public figure, the influence, maybe) because the Rome is so in love (“in love”) with him and ended up made him an idol.

    After he got killed on the cross, the Rome made him an idol 40 years later to create a religion called Christianity so that they can oppressed the Jews who are still residing there that time.”

    When you wrote these "If they were stoning adulterers ,...., left, right and centre... What do you think there were going to do to Heretics, Sorcerers and Others. How did Yeshua slip away in the midst of them...... hmmmm"

    ...you already given the answer.

    Why they can stones other with no problems and when comes to jesus, they somehow tried to avoid stoning him to death? You already given yourself answer here. Very clear, when stones others are not a problem at all, when comes to jesus, they somehow not so interested and not so keen to stones him. And they (pharisees) precipitated to let the palite (Rome) to do it.



  • MB About this “What was he writing on the sand that convicted them of their 'Chet'... ?”

    I believe you are referring to John 8:6-11, "They were saying this, testing Him, so that they might have grounds for accusing Him. But Jesus stooped down and with His finger wrote on the ground. 7 But when they persisted in asking Him, He straightened up, and said to them, “He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.” 8 Again He stooped down and wrote on the ground. 9 When they heard it, they began to go out one by one, beginning with the older ones, and He was left alone, and the woman, where she was, in the center of the court. 10 Straightening up, Jesus said to her, “Woman, where are they? Did no one condemn you?” 11 She said, “No one, Lord.” And Jesus said, “I do not condemn you, either. Go. From now on sin no more.”

    What was he writing on the sand? I do not know. But when jesus said on John 8:7 ……”He who is without sin among you, let him be the first to throw a stone at her.”

    He is actually referred/reminding them that in Ecclesiastes 7:20 “Indeed, there is no one on earth who is righteous, no one who does what is right and never sins.”

    With that, “9 When they heard it, they began to go out one by one, beginning with the older ones, and He was left alone, and the woman, where she was, in the center of the court.”

    The funny thing is that when missionaries tried to says jesus is a sinless man, and used the reversed effect to question back the older (from christianity view, they - the older are not so sinless, only jesus is a sinless lamb) -- here again proof that jesus is not a sinless man because he did not stone the woman himself.

    According to missionaries, since jesus is so righteous and following god laws, Jesus supposed to know torah that adulterer must stone to death at that time.

    Just a brief idea, in Judaism, celibacy (conventional conservatism so to speak, I am not sure if that is the correct term) is not a way to practice.

    Divorcing in Judaism is very common, not encourage, but common.

    In Christianity is way opposite. They have to force keep the marriage and divorce is a super big thing in conventional Europe way back then, even when it comes to a point that you really need to divorce to settle thing up u still have to tried to keep.

    I can give you example but not a good one, just a brief not so perfect example - - if a husband cheated on his wife, the wife has the right to divorced her husband because if she continues – this is adultery in a married life. This apply to vice versa too. A brief idea that celibacy is not a way to practice.

Saturday, 7 February 2015

On matters of the Heart Part II

  • Continuation..  

     
    MB Didn't the New Testament (in John) said that they (Pharisees) wanted to stone him and he (jesus) left? Here you go.

    John 8:58-59


    58 “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!”

    59 At this, they picked up stones to stone him, but Jesus hid himself, slipping away from the temple grounds.

    I guess if he did not slip away, he would be dead.

    By the way, Capital punishment (etc: hang on the cross) was controlled by the Rome at that time. Not the Jews.

    Even the Jews wanted to hang him on the cross, that would not happen because that was the law of the Rome.

  • Don Tan If they were stoning adulterers ,...., left, right and centre... What do you think there were going to do to Heretics, Sorcerers and Others. How did Yeshua slip away in the midst of them...... hmmmm

  • MB Avoid being stone.

  • MB Jesus anyway did get kill by the Rome no matter how he slip away.

    The Torah said that false prophet needs to be killed.


    The quote is Deuteronomy 13:2 - 4.

    The Jews might not be able to track him at that time for whatever reason, or have no real intention of direct stoning him to death on the spot or to kill him by their own hand (like you said – “avoid” hand dirty), but still he get killed.

    “Avoid” dirty hand is not the case here for jesus death since they can stones those adulterers to death etc…..why are they afraid to stone jesus when they can stone the others with no problem?

    (stoning thing is not apply in today world anymore since the temple is not stood.)

    The case here is that the Rome is in controlled of almost everything at that time especially criminal punishment. Or (just maybe) the Jews are afraid to stone jesus (due to his public figure, the influence, maybe) because the Rome is so in love (“in love”) with him and ended up made him an idol.

    After he got killed on the cross, the Rome made him an idol 40 years later to create a religion called Christianity so that they can oppressed the Jews who are still residing there that time.

    The Jews never worship Jesus and the Jews discourage any non-jew to worship jesus also or any form of idol. The Golden Claf incident is one of the example that tell us not to worship any idol.


  • MB  Daniel 7:13-14 is not about Jesus, it is about Israel, the whole nation.

    Do not hijack by placing jesus (a jew, one person) only.


    Daniel 7:13-14 is the whole Jews (nation of Israel basically). When read Daniel 7:13-14, please read the rest of the chapter of Daniel. Read all the way to Daniel 26.

    From the message you given above, you quote the Hebrew translation which is correct, but with Christianity mindset.

    In the Christians bible translation, they translated as “son of man” (see the link here: https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+7:13-14), not ““like a son of a human being” (k’var enash), the one you quote on the top is correct.

    Why do we know that Daniel 7 has nothing to do with Jesus? Yet again because the visions associated with the one “like the son of a human being” never happened with Jesus.

    Read the chapter.

    We are told in the next line (14) “dominion and glory and a kingdom, and all peoples, nations, and tongues shall serve him; his dominion is an eternal dominion, which will not be removed, and his kingdom is one which will not be destroyed.”

    Now missionaries will try to claim this is not an “earthly kingdom” but Daniel 7 makes this lie apparent.

    Keep reading. . . Line 17. [He -- the angel -- said] “These huge beasts, which are four, are four kingdoms, which will arise from the earth.”

    Kingdoms of the EARTH.


    “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me...
    biblegateway.com