Prologue
Iskandar Shah 2 on Tun Dr. Mahathir's Blog Chedet on the Topic
of '
PEMBUNUHAN WANITA BERZINA (Death of an Adulteress)' in
an excerpt remarked that
10-In the meanwhile,when the flow into the religion of one true God
has
become insignificant,the flow out of Muslims of the one true God to
the
‘three-in one’ God instead has now become very significant. Millions
in
Africa and Indonesia are now officially murtads.
My reply in context:
Does Iskandar know why millions of Africans or Indonesians
have found
Yeshua. Its not just disillusionment. Yeshua has begun to appear in dreams to
oppressed Muslims. Those oppressed by their own Brethren. No one preached
to them. They actually seek out Missionaries. Islam’s inner conflict which is
growing exponentially. I’m afraid, if Israel is gone from the middle-east.
Someone else is going to be the scapegoat. I’m
pretty sure it is going to be
Christians. Actually, the Coptics are the
targets now. Lastly, Missionary Work.
Why not? If there is ‘no
compulsion in religion’(Surah 2:256) then one should
be free to freely
leave the faith or is that just a mantra?
Iskandar responded with 11 points which i feel needs to be addressed.
I will list 3 in Part I
1-Dear dtan I am not keen to start a Muslim-Christian dialogue here but I must
respond somehow to you.
Iskandar, I hope you will respond to my invitation on this Blog
2-The only thing you people had succeeded we Muslims has not is the
ability to
get out of the crutches of the church that had kept you in
the dark ages a few
centuries ago -at a time we were the ones
enlightened with a Golden Age just
before our ‘church’ took over.
I am well aware of Ancient Arabic contributions of Algebra and Astronomy
prior to the introduction of Islam
The Church (Chatolic) in the Dark Ages was popularly potrayed as some malignant
'Anti- Science' which could not be further from the truth. Eg. Galileo controversy.
#######################################################################
Persecution of Galileo [http://www.catholic.com/tracts/the-galileo-controversy]
The Church is not anti-scientific. It has supported scientific
endeavors for centuries.
During Galileo’s time, the Jesuits had a highly
respected group of astronomers and
scientists in Rome. In addition,
many notable scientists received encouragement and
funding from the
Church and from individual Church officials. Many of the scientific
advances during this period were made either by clerics or as a result
of Church funding.
Nicolaus Copernicus dedicated his most famous work, On the Revolution of the Celestial
Orbs,
in which he gave an excellent account of heliocentricity, to Pope Paul
III. Copernicus
entrusted this work to Andreas Osiander, a Lutheran
clergyman who knew that Protestant
reaction to it would be negative,
since Martin Luther seemed to have condemned the new
theory, and, as a
result, the book would be condemned. Osiander wrote a preface to the
book,
in which heliocentrism was presented only as a theory that would
account for the movements
of the planets more simply than geocentrism
did—something Copernicus did not intend.
Ten years prior to Galileo, Johannes Kepler published a
heliocentric work that expanded on Copernicus’ work. As a result, Kepler
also found opposition among his fellow Protestants
for his heliocentric
views and found a welcome reception among some Jesuits who were
known
for their scientific achievements.
#######################################################################
Note, the Vatican has a full time Priest (Phd Canadian Astronomer) who works at the
Vatican Observatory today
3-We Muslims had been kept closed by these self righteous and
insecured religious
authorities who are quick to condemn us to apostacy
the moment we challenge
their wrong practises,like holding on to time
bound secondary documents that not
only may be irrelevant for another
time,it is also doubted to be authentic materials
in the first
place.Without even allowing a fair debate they have condemned these
critical minded people apostates,so that the mainstream will be kept
away from them.
I've brought this issue up with Parameswara 2 in another conversation per Uthmani
standardization of the Quran. Over 200 original manuscripts were torched. The excuse
given that the others were defective. Yet for some reason burning manuscripts are
acceptable. Also, recent discovery of the Sana Manuscripts in Yemen which predate
the Uthmani version under lock and key. Why? Why then claim that the Quran is the
direct revelation i.e. word from God if it was re-written and re-compiled several times?