The Difference between a Sheep or Goat.

     As a believer in the Mosiach. My view has always been that Christians ,besides
their differences, believed in the same God. I have come to believe otherwise ,in what
the Prophet Joel ,calls the Last Days. Many Christians, have a believe, that is
seemingly, contradictory to the Gospel Message.

     Some are pious, some liberal, some right-winged, some are social justice warriors.
Few will share the Gospel, and most associate a God called Yahweh, with political
correctness, or even social justice. Some will even invite Imams into their churches,
believing that Christian Orthodoxy is dead. Leading their flocks to be slaughtered by
Islamic wolves.

     Some go to Bible Schools, seemingly believe in the doctrines, that they are thought.
My best friend, who is a Pastor once said to me one of the wisest thing, that every
Pastor should espouse. Doctrine was created, to prevent the spread of Heresy. And yet,
there are those who Worship their Doctrine.  Eg. infant baptism, adult baptism,
re-baptism etc

     When the God called Yahweh said in the second commandment (Exodus 20:3), not
to make, an image (worship idols) for ourselves. He did not just mean carved images.
He also meant symbols, that ,we hold value in our lives. Did you ever notice that, it was
only 'real people' that Yeshua could stomach. A reformed tax-collector, prostitute, thief or
murderer, fishermen, and very very very few religious types. One had to be blinded
,on the Road to Damascus, before he could embrace the Mosiach. Real people don't
hide behind political correctness. They don't know what that is. They only knew that,
there was something wrong with their lives. Only the Mosiach could draw them close
,and forgive their Sins.


  

³¹ “But when the Son of Man^[a] comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, 
then he will sit upon his glorious throne. ³² All the nations^[b] will be gathered in 
his presence, and he will separate the people as a shepherd separates the sheep
 from the goats. ³³  He will place the sheep at his right hand and the goats at his 
left. ~ Matthew 25

What is the Trinity ?

hello, 

thank you very much for response on me.

however, i want to say sorry to u for late reply..

can i know about what exactly is thrinity? actually i already

 read research regarding on thrinity but i kind of not understand 

with statement "not three god but only one god" and why choose 

concept of water to conclude the thrinity concept?  what is original

sin? can i know who is "pope", "minister" and etc? isn't a role or

positions in church? 

thank you very much... 

N.E. 

Shalom N...,


 
Ah, you have many questions.


Question 1

Trinity or the concept of the Trinity was termed at the Council of Nicaea.

Early Church Fathers both Eastern, and Western Groups got together
to debate the rising tide of Heresy. Heresy occurs when someone begins
to spread false teaching on Christianity.  They coined the term Trinity in
its simplest form 3 in 1, the nature of God.


Question 2

Water is an analogy or metaphor to explain how the Trinity is possible.

 
Just to show you that it is possible. Let's go back to the Hebrew language.
The God called YHWH first appears to the Hebrew nation.


They called him Elohim. The term Elohim means 'One' God, but it is a little
more complicated. God is not purely singular.


He is HaShem (His Name)
He has a Ruach ( His Spirit)
He also appeared as Mosiach ( Isa Al-Masih). He actually appears several
times in the Tanakh (Old Testament). Burning Bush in Exodus, in Daniels
 dreams,
as the Angel of the Lord, etc,etc,etc


Read Isaiah 53 on the coming of Al-Masih. HaShem refers to him as
 'HIS ARM'. Yurezowa Yahweh. Not messenger, not angel, etc,etc,etc




Question 3

Original Sin occurred in the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve disobeyed God's
command not to eat from the tree of knowledge. Therefore all generations
are infected by this disease called Sin per the prophet Isaiah.


Why is there a need for the Cross ? because Sin has to be atoned. The Hebrews
did that in the past.


Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the

shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. ~ hebrews 9:22




Question 4

As Christians, we are all priests. Church roles are man made religious institutions.
Nothing evil about that. It is just a way to organize a Church body.




In the Name Yeshua Al-Masih

Don 

Yeshua within the Christmas narrative Part III

Rabbiton Rabbiton But Christianity claim that Jesus was born of a holly spirit, 

not through sexual intercourse. When Tanach said about Messiah from the line 

of David it means biological line, not some Holy Spirit pregnant a woman out 

of the blue. Therefore your interpretation above is not correct.

Rabbiton Rabbiton Jesus destroyed the temple, he did not restore the temple 

hence the claim above is not accurate too. Messiah suppose to restore the temple 

not destroy. Jesus in Matthew said on the mountain that no one stone will stand.

Don Tan Tanakh says Mosiach will come through the line of David. Nothing more

] or less. Yeshua predicted that the Temple would be destroyed. He did not ordain it.

 Secondly, you cannot rebuild a temple without it first getting destroyed. Kapish....

Rabbiton Rabbiton Messiah & David:

The Tanach mentioned that Messiah must be from the BIOLOGICAL line of David, 

not spiritual (you missed this point again as I already mentioned above). When 

Christianity claim that jesus was born of a virgin mary pregnant by the holy spirit 

– that would not only disqualified him from the lineage of David, and would totally 

not sum up as the Messiah from the line of David at all.

Without referring to the Tanach (Old Testament), by just reading the Christians book 

new testament – why does the NT has 2 genealogies of jesus (in Matthew 1:16 & 

Luke 3:23)? If it is only from the “line” of David NT should not have 2 genealogies 

of him.

Matthew 1:16
and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is 

called Christ.

Luke 3:23
Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the 

son, so it was thought, of Joseph, the son of Heli.

Matthew’s genealogy from David to jesus is: David, Solomon, Rehoboam, Abijah, 

Asa, Jehoshaphat, Jerhoram, Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, Hezekiah, Manasseh, Amon, 

Josiah, Jeconiah, Shealtiel, Zerubbabel, Abiud, Eliakim, Azor, Zadok, Akim, Eliud, 

Eleazar, Mattan, Jacob, Joseph, Mary, Jesus.

Luke’s genealogy from David to jesus is: David, Nathan, Mattatha, Menna, Melea, 

Eliakim, Jonam, Joseph, Judah, Simeon, Levi, Matthat, Jorim, Eliezer, Joshua, Er, 

Elmadam, Cosam, Addi, Melki, Neri, Shealtiel, Zerubbabel, Rhesa, Joanan, Joda, 

Josech, Semein, Mattathias, Maath, Naggai, Esli, Nahum, Amos, Mattathias, Joseph, 

Jannai, Melki, Levi, Matthat, Heli, Joseph, Jesus.

It is very clear that these two genealogies must be describing two different people.

Don Tan I agree, there is an accuracy issue. Is that your benchmark ? Rabbis don't 

know of anyone, i bet. Right now, that fulfills this lineage prophecy ,if any. You 

cannot just say that the null hypothesis is incorrect. Who then, among Israeli's today,

 would fulfill this coming prophecy, an alternate hypothesis. I say none. Yeshua was 

never against empirical evidence. He after all, told Thomas, to put his hands in the 

holes on his side.

John 20:24-29

24Now Thomas (also known as Didymus[a]), one of the Twelve, was not with the 

disciples when Jesus came. 25So the other disciples told him, “We have seen the Lord!” 

But he said to them, “Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where 

the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.”

26A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. 

Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, 

“Peace be with you!” 27Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands. 

Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.”